It has been good to talk about OA this week with colleagues at the SSD PRC and MPLS GPC and with the Humanities Administrators — to be able to outline what is and what is not changing; emphasise how much can be achieved by self-archiving material in subject-based repositories and or the Oxford Research Archive; contest the notion that Gold OA is ‘better’ than Green OA; reaffirm that where and when to publish is and must remain an academic decision; and hear people’s concerns and questions. I am pleased we can now release version 1 of the Oxford Open Access web site and begin our OA information and discussion sessions led by Subject Librarians. There’s a lot to do to help support Oxford colleagues navigate their way smoothly through territory infested with strange terms, unfinished funder conditions and contested interests.
- Home »
- Open access resources »
- Open Access – The Basics
- Templates
- Glossary
- Learn more about OA
- Finding Open Access Articles and Monographs
- Finding Creative Commons Media
- Copyright, Creative Commons and Open Access
- Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs)
- Embargoes in Open Access
- OA publication routes (Gold, green etc).
- Open Monographs
- PrePrints
- Rights retention at Oxford
- Self-deposit ‘green’ OA, repositories, and depositing
- OA at Oxford »
- Funds & Funders »
- Funds held at Oxford »
- Other funders »
- Blood Cancer UK
- The British Academy
- ERC and The European Commission
- Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
- Bill and Malinda Gates Foundation
- John Fell Fund
- Leverhulme trust
- National Institute for Health Research
- National Institutes of Health (USA)
- Parkinson’s UK
- The Royal Society
- Versus Arthritis
- Unfunded researchers
- Rights retention
- Oxford Publisher Deals »
- cOAlition S and Plan S
- REF 2021
- Training & Events »
- FAQ

